Visiting artist to the Herbarium

On Wednesday we had a visitor the herbarium-Moira Carter. She is an artist who has worked on the Iraqi Flora Project at Kew Botanic Gardens.

The previous day I had gotten out a variety of unusual looking seed pods for her to draw.

Here is some of her work:

Drawing of a horn nut, and unusual looking seed that looks very much like a bull’s head.

Martynia, or Devil’s Claw.

A drawing of

Thanks for visiting Moira!

You can see Moira’s illustrations for the Iraqi Flora Project here.

Posted in Herbarium | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Mathematical, Mysterious Cicadas

The photo above is a picture I took last year in Belize of a molted cicada skin. This is the husk the insect leaves behind as it finally emerges as an adult insect after its long life cycle. Despite the fact that I constantly heard cicadas while living in Belize for 13 years- I’ve only ever seen two adults. The insects are notoriously good at hiding themselves. More often, I’d come across these shed husks on the side of tree trunks.

The noise, however, is ubiquitous. Cicadas create the loud clicking noise using a drum-like structure on the side of their abdomen known as a tymbal. This structure vibrates rapidly and can cause clicks so loud they have been recorded in excess of 120 decibels- about as loud as most rock concerts. The noise can be heard for miles. This serves one purpose- to attract females.

After mating, the female carves out slits in the bark of trees then lays eggs in them. When the eggs hatch, the nymphs drop the the ground where they burrow into the soil, where they stay for years.

Different cicada species have differing lengths when it comes to how many years they spend under the ground. This is perhaps the most mysterious part of the cicada’s life cycle. The number of years between the cicada nymph burrowing into the soil and its emergence as an adult is always that of a prime number. 2,3,5,7,11,13 and 17 year life cycles have been recorded- all prime numbers.

It is not known why the breeding cycle revolves around prime numbers. One theory is that it is harder for a natural predator to predict the cicada’s emergence through such irregular timing. The cicadas also all emerge at the same time. This is also thought to be a evolutionary advantage against predators, as thousands of cicadas emerging at once makes it harder for predators to eat them all.

Manchester Museum has quite a large collection of cicadas, most of which were collected by Herbert Stevens, a tea planter who lived in India. I’ve finished documenting the entire collection, along with the Fulgoridae (lantern bugs) Stevens also collected.

Tosena, a cicada genus from Southeast Asia:

Other specimens of note were those collected by Allan Brindle, who was Keeper of Entomology at The Manchester Museum from 1961-1982. In 1942, Brindle was called up to the Lancashire Fusiliers, where he was quickly transferred to the Intelligence section due to his ability to speak many languages. He was posted in India, where he collected many specimens of insects during his service there, including some of the Museum’s cicadas.

A few weeks ago, The Manchester Museum held a Big Saturday event called “Bug Art”. Art students from Stockport College had been working closely with the entomological collections to create insect based artwork. Two of the students focused on cicadas. One of them created a template to “make your own origami cicada.” It was a big hit and I had to give it a try!

As well as the art, we curators had insect specimens out on display. The cicadas were actually a big draw, with many people wanting to know more about what they were, where they were found and the mysterious complexity of their life cycle. I enjoyed myself and was pleased that visitors enjoyed learning about these beautiful insects too.

Posted in Entomology, In the field, learning | Tagged | 3 Comments

The Simms Indo-Australian Collection

I’m currently working on documenting and updating the nomenclature of this collection of butterflies, which was donated to The Manchester Museum in 1960 by the brothers Harold M and F.H. Simms along with a smaller European collection of Lepidoptera.

Along with the collection itself, which consists of thousands of butterfly specimens, archival material such as notebooks and lists were also donated. A notebook contains a lovingly handwritten list of species collected from the region.

The collection still needs a professional taxonomist to look at it, but I’ve been using references including LepIndex on the Natural History Museum website to check the nomenclature is accurate. There are also many misidentifications and unpublished names on labels in the collection.

Indian Crow Butterflies:

Butterflies from the family Satyridae:

One of the most interesting species in the collection is the Dead Leaf butterly (Kallima inachus). The butterfly sports colourful blue wings with an intense band of orange running through them and black wingtips. However, when its wings are closed it resembles a dried leaf complete with vein markings. During the dry and wet season, the species has different colouration, with the colours being much more subdued in the dry season.

Dry season form of Kallima inachus:

Documentation of the collection involved creating and modifying taxonomic records on KE Emu, the Museum’s collections database. Butterfly taxonomy is almost constantly undergoing revision, so many of the species names had been moved into different genera.

I’ll be posting more about the families in this collection as the project progresses.

Posted in curation, Entomology | Leave a comment

Ecuador in the Herbarium

I kind of grin at the title I’ve chosen for this post, as it certainly didn’t feel like Ecuador in there today! It was pretty cold!

The reason Ecuador is the theme of this post has less to do with temperature and more to do with the fact that The Manchester Museum herbarium is currently working with photographer and artist Johan Oldekop. I was asked to find some Ecuadorian ferns and illustrations of the specimens in the Leo Grindon cultivated Fern collection.

Sadly, we currently have no ferns from Ecuador!

We do, however have other plant material collected from that area in the General Flowering Plants and Carpological collections. so I got out a few specimens and put them aside.

Myroxylum is a medicinal plant that is best known for Balsam of Tolu- a resin from the plant that is often used as an ingrediant in cough syrup.

Unfortunately some of the herbarium sheets were very dusty and needed a gentle clean with smoke sponge! Before:

After:

Epiphytes are important plants in the rainforest. They have evolved to grow on larger trees in order to gain more access to light in the competitive canopy. Here is a sheet of Pitcairnia pungens, an epiphytic plant native to Ecuador:

I’m still hunting for Ecuadorian specimens in the Herbarium, and will update on my progress.

Posted in Conservation, curation, Herbarium | Leave a comment

Identification

I’m back working in the Entomology and Botany departments here at the Manchester Museum. One of my first projects upon returning was to separate and identify Neotropical specimens of Lepidoptera by family and eventually, genus and species.

There is a wonderful set of books called Butterflies of the World by Bernard D’Abrera. Each book lists butterflies from various regions around the world and by family. The photographs within are also lifesized pictures of the Lepidoptera.

I looked through old storeboxes for undetermined specimens of Lepidoptera. I was able to tell if some (like the Ithomiidae) were from the Neotropics immediately. For others, I had to see if they had any geographical information on the labels and compare specimens with those in the books.

Some of the specimens were very old and battered, like this Morpho. There were many loose wings and bodies that had become brittle and broken.

I was able to repair some, such as this clearwing. Before:

After:

Most of the specimens belonged to the families Ithomiidae and Heliconiidae, but there were a few Papilionidae and Nymphalidae that needed identifying, as well as one Morpho.

The newly determined specimens will soon be incorporated into the collection.

Posted in Entomology | Leave a comment

Feather Conservation Course

On Wednesday and Thursday I attended a feather conservation workshop delivered by conservator Allyson Rae. The course was held at the Norfolk Museums and Archaeology Study Centre. Note that while there is a picture of a bundle of cassowary feathers in this post, we did not work on it- it was merely passed around for viewing along with a bag of Yellow-Shafted-Flicker feathers. No CITES listed species were worked with for the purposes of this workshop.

There were about 12 participants on the course from various backgrounds spanning across natural history and ethnography. Some I was happy to see I had met before. After getting to know each other, we settled down to learn about the properties of feathers, their chemical composition, colour variation in species, function, structure and the importance of bird’s preen oils to the health of a feather.
We then moved on to what can damage feathers. Light damage is quite common, and we were shown some examples in the galleries. Also common is damage from pests and deterioration from keeping the specimen at the wrong levels of humidity.

Light damage. This owl is not supposed to be white!:

Allyson Rae explaining the difference between a contour feather and a filoplume:

We were asked to observe the structure of different feathers under a microscope.

Most birds have various groups of feathers covering their body in patterns of contour feathers, with filoplumes underneath. The expections to this rule are the penguins and ratites. Ratite feathers are very hair-like, as can be seen below with the bundle of cassowary feathers:

On the second day, we were all given a pack containing various feathers conservation tools such as smoke sponge, cotton, Industrial Methylated Spirit, Mowilith 50, webril strips and a chemical sponge.

Our first attempt at the treatment of a feather was to be cleaning with a solvent. I chose a particularly filthy feather as I wanted to be sure of the results. I placed the feather on a bed of absorbant tissue and used cotton wool to apply the IMS over it.

Feather before treatment:

Feather during treatment, with the IMS drawing the dirt out

Feather after treatment:

We were asked to experiment with a variety of dry techniques. There was a cloth called “Dust Bunny” in our pack and I was surprised to see that it was just as effective as the IMS with regards to removing dirt. I also tried the smoke sponge (not terribly effective) and rubber powder (also not terribly effective.) I found the IMS and Dust Bunny to be my favorite cleaning tools, though of course different jobs call for different methods and solutions.

We then moved on to “wet treatments.” We immersed both a filoplume and a contour feather in a tray of water and added a few drops of IMS. Eventually the filoplume looked alarming. It had lost its fluffiness and looked like a strip of drowned…something. However, these type of feathers are remarkably stable. After blowing cool air across it with a hair dryer and reshaping it with my fingers- it looked just as a fluffy (and cleaner!) than before I had soaked it.

Our final challenge was to repair a broken feather. My feather was broken in three places. It looked hopeless.
However, after Allyson showed us her technique for repairing damaged feathers, I quickly set to work using it. First, the feather was soaked in water, which made it return to a smoother shape. I then took a spare feather and sliced through the shaft, carefully removing the hollow white cells within. I then used the Mowilith 50 (a fast drying adhesive) to attach the new shaft to the broken one, using it as a splint to join the 3 breaks together.

The result:

I’m very happy with the results of the treatment on my feathers, and can’t wait to use them at work!

Posted in Conservation, ornithology, specimen preparation, Taxidermy, Zoology | Leave a comment

Snapshots from the past

Yesterday my volunteer Veronica and I put away some interesting objects called magic lantern slides. Lantern slides were a popular tool used in the early days at Manchester Museum for lectures and presentations. Most of the slides were of photographs of parasitology, in particular the protist Plasmodium responsible for Malaria, but there are also anatomical drawings, photos of insects and marine dwelling creatures. The slides are housed in small cabinets with custom built drawers, as you can see in the picture below. Many of the slides were not properly housed or had not been put away after being digitised for an online gallery. They are made of glass and are therefore very fragile. It was our job to make sure the slides were safely housed.

We had great fun looking through all the amazing images from the past, including photos of extinct animals such as the Quagga. Many of the photographs were stained with colour, such as this one. The label read “what was found in the box!”:

Wish I knew the story behind that caption!

Posted in curation, History, Zoology | Leave a comment